Strategy: It’s All About Co-Mailing
Why it’s more crucial than ever to do it, and all the things you should and shouldn’t do
July 2008 By Stephen R. Lett
8 Co-mailing can drive up manufacturing costs, which could potentially eliminate some of the resulting postal savings.
8 Catalogers with large mailstreams might not allow a smaller mailing to co-mail with them. The advantage is clearly with the smaller mailer, however, this varies printer to printer.
8 The printer rather than the service bureau must do the presort, which requires more coordination on your part.
8 You may have to redesign your back cover and order form to accommodate your co-mail partner
Off-Line Co-Mailing
Advantages
4 Quantity Mailed: Starting as low as 50M.
4 Postal Savings: Larger gross postal savings, as catalogs participating are generally shorter runs that start with higher postage rates.
4 Better Deliverability: More catalogs are delivered to SCFs rather than bulk mail centers, penetrating the USPS deeper. There’s a larger discount to deliver to an SCF.
Disadvantages
8 Like in-line, one of your competitors could be a co-mail partner.
8 A co-mail partner could still drop out.
8 The mail date may still need to be adjusted.
8 A co-mail partner could still miss the press date.
8 Increased manufacturing cost: Off-line is more equipment- and labor-intense.
8 The size of the mailstream can be a factor with off-line. This depends on the printer’s pricing structure.
8 Your printer must do the presort, just like in-line.
8 A redesign may be required to accommodate co-mail partners.
8 Ink-Jetting: Only the back cover can be ink-jet imaged.
In-Line Requirements
While in-line co-mailing offers greater benefits, not every cataloger is in a position to co-mail. There are certain requirements for the mailer:
1. The catalogs must all be the same trim size.
2. The ink-jet areas also must be the same on both the order form or order form page and on the back cover.
3. Partners generally need to be within 32 pages of each other in total page count.
4. Both must have the same distribution pattern, i.e., the same in-home dates or mail dates (which some catalogers want for fulfillment purposes, since this method tends to level out order flow).
5. Your printer must do the ink-jet formatting and list sorting since its machinery does the coding. This work can’t be done by your service bureau.
Most printers charge by splitting the postage savings equally with the mailer on a proportional basis. The savings are generally proportional to the number of names you contribute: If you supply 75 percent of the names, you’ll get 75 percent of the savings.
The chart below is a typical co-mailing cost analysis. The company with the lower quantity (Mailer C) is charged more since Mailer A is having a greater direct impact on the savings. Mailer A will save $22,500, Mailer B will save $15,000 and Mailer C will save $9,000 before paying the printer.
The Dingley Press is the only printer I know of that charges its customers on a per/M basis for the actual service it performs for in-line co-mailing: The cataloger receives 100 percent of the postal savings, and it pays Dingley a set fee per thousand catalogs. Other printers approach their charges differently, but the savings are similar.
In-line co-mail partners generally number two to four. The number of off-line participates is almost unlimited — 12 is not uncommon — but off-line co-mail partners are mostly smaller mailers. While printers may approach their charges differently, the end results in terms of the potential savings are similar. The typical result is higher gross savings, but the fee is also higher because the off-line process is totally separate from the binding and requires capital investment for the machinery and labor to run it.
If you don’t co-mail your catalog with other catalogs, you should. The savings can be significant, and the advantages far offset the disadvantages.
Stephen R. Lett is the president of Lett Direct, a catalog consulting firm specializing in circulation planning and forecasting. He can be reached at (302) 539-7257 or by e-mail at steve@lettdirect.com.
8 Catalogers with large mailstreams might not allow a smaller mailing to co-mail with them. The advantage is clearly with the smaller mailer, however, this varies printer to printer.
8 The printer rather than the service bureau must do the presort, which requires more coordination on your part.
8 You may have to redesign your back cover and order form to accommodate your co-mail partner
Off-Line Co-Mailing
Advantages
4 Quantity Mailed: Starting as low as 50M.
4 Postal Savings: Larger gross postal savings, as catalogs participating are generally shorter runs that start with higher postage rates.
4 Better Deliverability: More catalogs are delivered to SCFs rather than bulk mail centers, penetrating the USPS deeper. There’s a larger discount to deliver to an SCF.
Disadvantages
8 Like in-line, one of your competitors could be a co-mail partner.
8 A co-mail partner could still drop out.
8 The mail date may still need to be adjusted.
8 A co-mail partner could still miss the press date.
8 Increased manufacturing cost: Off-line is more equipment- and labor-intense.
8 The size of the mailstream can be a factor with off-line. This depends on the printer’s pricing structure.
8 Your printer must do the presort, just like in-line.
8 A redesign may be required to accommodate co-mail partners.
8 Ink-Jetting: Only the back cover can be ink-jet imaged.
In-Line Requirements
While in-line co-mailing offers greater benefits, not every cataloger is in a position to co-mail. There are certain requirements for the mailer:
1. The catalogs must all be the same trim size.
2. The ink-jet areas also must be the same on both the order form or order form page and on the back cover.
3. Partners generally need to be within 32 pages of each other in total page count.
4. Both must have the same distribution pattern, i.e., the same in-home dates or mail dates (which some catalogers want for fulfillment purposes, since this method tends to level out order flow).
5. Your printer must do the ink-jet formatting and list sorting since its machinery does the coding. This work can’t be done by your service bureau.
Most printers charge by splitting the postage savings equally with the mailer on a proportional basis. The savings are generally proportional to the number of names you contribute: If you supply 75 percent of the names, you’ll get 75 percent of the savings.
The chart below is a typical co-mailing cost analysis. The company with the lower quantity (Mailer C) is charged more since Mailer A is having a greater direct impact on the savings. Mailer A will save $22,500, Mailer B will save $15,000 and Mailer C will save $9,000 before paying the printer.
The Dingley Press is the only printer I know of that charges its customers on a per/M basis for the actual service it performs for in-line co-mailing: The cataloger receives 100 percent of the postal savings, and it pays Dingley a set fee per thousand catalogs. Other printers approach their charges differently, but the savings are similar.
In-line co-mail partners generally number two to four. The number of off-line participates is almost unlimited — 12 is not uncommon — but off-line co-mail partners are mostly smaller mailers. While printers may approach their charges differently, the end results in terms of the potential savings are similar. The typical result is higher gross savings, but the fee is also higher because the off-line process is totally separate from the binding and requires capital investment for the machinery and labor to run it.
If you don’t co-mail your catalog with other catalogs, you should. The savings can be significant, and the advantages far offset the disadvantages.
Stephen R. Lett is the president of Lett Direct, a catalog consulting firm specializing in circulation planning and forecasting. He can be reached at (302) 539-7257 or by e-mail at steve@lettdirect.com.
Page 1 | 2
Basics of Print Production
Managing Print Production
